Rate this post


To say that the way forward for our planet’s sustainability is ‘in our palms’, will not be merely metaphorical anymore. This yr, three international and scientifically credible reviews have been launched, back-to-back, which might be foretelling an identical story, albeit, in several narratives: the world must get up to the results of meals in its plate, particularly as regards land availability and degradation.

Early in January, the ‘EAT-Lancet Fee Report’ was launched the place a lead writer of the report, Prof. Walter Willett of the Harvard TH Chan College of Public Well being, summarised that “transformation to wholesome diets by 2050 would require substantial dietary shifts. International consumption of fruits, greens, nuts and legumes should double, and consumption of meals corresponding to crimson meat and sugar should be lowered by greater than 50 per cent. A diet wealthy in plant-based meals and with fewer animal supply meals confers each improved well being and environmental advantages”.

Emphasising that ‘wholesome diets’ and ‘sustainable meals manufacturing’ are intricately linked, the report proposed a primarily flexitarian diet with an indicative break-up of the macro-nutrient and calorific consumption per day that largely comes from a variety of plant-based meals, low quantities from animal sources and really restricted doses of refined, processed and sugary meals.

What has land to do with this? One other particular report on ‘Local weather Change and Land’, launched earlier in August this yr by the Intergovernmental Panel for Local weather Change (IPCC), offered proof that “international inhabitants development and modifications in per capita consumption of meals, feed, fibre, timber and power have brought on unprecedented charges of land and freshwater use…”

Of the full international ice-free land space, 1 per cent is utilized by infrastructure, 12 per cent by irrigated and non-irrigated crop-land, 37 per cent by intensive and intensive pastures, 22 per cent by plantation and timber forests and the one remaining 28 per cent are forested and un-forested ecosystems or barren land with minimal human use.

In toto, 71 per cent of worldwide land is immediately or not directly linked to meals and livestock manufacturing. The report additional factors out that diversification of the meals system/balanced diets that includes plant-based meals might free a number of million sq. kilometres of land.

The 2 research above discuss impacts and convey to the forefront the necessity for balanced and wholesome diets to maintain the planet’s pure assets. The sensible query, nonetheless, is: Whether or not in a globalised world with robust agricultural commerce linkages and completely different consumption patterns, sustainable land use can ever be achieved?

Yet one more report launched a couple of weeks in the past by the ‘UN-SDSN led FABLE Consortium’ presents outcomes from a cross-country modelling train involving 18 international locations that set medium time period particular person nationwide targets to attain zero starvation, low dietary illness danger, zero web deforestation, and minimal biodiversity, nitrogen and phosphorous losses — all on the identical time.

The India a part of modelling, led by IIM Ahmedabad, makes use of built-in calculation instruments and took part in coordinated iterations with the 17 different international locations. Indications from this train is that sustainable pathways can certainly be achieved by: investing in expertise for big good points in agricultural productiveness; shifts in diets in the direction of much less meat consumption; slowdown in inhabitants development; lowered meals losses; secure per-capita demand for non-food merchandise; and the ensuing fall in demand for pasture and crop-land.

Based on Guido Schmidt-Traub, government director of UN-SDSN, “outcomes from the FABLE Consortium are encouraging and present that governments should design analytical devices and insurance policies to develop their land-use with a long-term perspective to keep away from locking themselves into unsustainable land-use and meals methods that might be very troublesome and expensive to reverse later”.

Hans-Otto Pörtner, co-chair IPCC WGII, mentioned in an interview to Nature journal that, “we don’t need to inform folks what to eat, however it could certainly be useful, for each local weather and human well being, if folks in lots of wealthy international locations consumed much less meat, and if politics would create applicable incentives to that impact.”

High science-policymakers look as much as India for international management in growing a brand new world culinary framework — given its extraordinary and traditionally deep plant-based cuisines. Is it then time to transcend political jingoism, settle for the query of dietary safety on scientific deserves and be frontrunners on this change?

Ranjan Ghosh is a college member at IIM Ahmedabad. Article is written with inputs from Chandan Jha, analysis fellow, IIM Ahmedabad